U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand and 15 other Senate Democrats have taken a stand against a proposed rule that could have devastating effects on the nation’s water supply. In a letter addressed to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers, the senators expressed their strong opposition to the proposed rule, stating that it ignores science and poses a threat to the drinking water of millions of Americans.
The proposed rule, known as the “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) rule, seeks to limit federal water protections under the Clean Water Act. It would narrow the definition of which bodies of water are protected, leaving many vulnerable to pollution and contamination. This includes smaller streams and wetlands that are crucial for maintaining the health and quality of larger bodies of water.
In their letter, Senator Gillibrand and her colleagues highlighted the importance of clean water for both human health and the environment. They cited the EPA’s own estimates that the proposed rule would remove protections for at least 18% of streams and 51% of wetlands in the United States, potentially putting the drinking water of over 117 million Americans at risk.
The senators also pointed out that the proposed rule disregards the overwhelming scientific evidence that shows the interconnectedness of water systems. Polluted water from smaller bodies can easily flow into larger ones, making it essential to protect all bodies of water in order to maintain the overall health of our water supply.
Furthermore, the senators argued that the proposed rule would have a disproportionate impact on marginalized communities, including low-income and minority populations, who are already more likely to be exposed to contaminated water. This would only exacerbate existing environmental and health disparities.
In addition to the potential harm to human health, the senators also raised concerns about the impact on wildlife and ecosystems. Clean water is vital for the survival of many species and any threats to their habitats could have far-reaching consequences.
The letter also highlighted the flawed process by which the proposed rule was developed. It was rushed through without proper consultation with stakeholders and without considering the input of experts and scientists. This has raised serious doubts about the legitimacy of the rule and its potential consequences.
Senator Gillibrand and her colleagues urged the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers to reconsider the proposed rule and to instead work towards strengthening federal water protections. They emphasized the need for a science-based approach that takes into account the interconnectedness of water systems and the importance of protecting all bodies of water.
The senators’ letter has been met with widespread support from environmental and public health organizations, as well as from other lawmakers. It is a powerful reminder of the importance of safeguarding our water supply and the need for evidence-based policies that prioritize the well-being of all Americans.
In conclusion, Senator Gillibrand and 15 other Senate Democrats have taken a bold and necessary step in standing up for clean water and the health of our communities. Their letter serves as a strong rebuke to the proposed rule and a call to action for the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers to prioritize science and the well-being of the American people. Let us hope that their voices are heard and that our water supply remains protected for generations to come.
